RICHARD WOOLCOTT. Over reaction in the South China Sea when US influence is waning and Chinese influence is rising

The present and recent Australian Governments seem to have become
victims of their own China and Russia phobias.

In a situation in which China is rising to – or has already attained – super
power status ; and in which the United States is losing influence,but is,as
yet,unwilling to accept this great change in the global situation, the
Australian Government should accept that China is simply demonstrating
its rightful place on the world stage.

The Australian Government is reported in the media today as criticising
China for adopting ” aggressive tactics ” and for a Chinese destroyer
launching an ” unsafe ” challenge to a US warship in the South China Sea.
This implies that, while the Australian Government has no problem if the US
behaves in this way,we regard it as dangerous,if a Chinese naval ship behaves
in the same manner. Such an approach is of course illogical  !

Can you imagine the reaction in Washington if a Chinese naval ship,or Chinese
aircraft,were to encircle Hawaii and the Florida keys ,or to sail inside the US 12
mile limit,as US has done in relation to comparable areas of close interest to
China. US defence officials urge Australia do so,but at least,so far,we have
wisely declined. We – like Indonesia – are not one of the five claimants,which
include both Taiwan and China.

We are indeed placing ourselves in a very curious situation because Trump is
clearly a unilateralist.So where does this leave Australia, as an ally of a United
States which, under Trump ,does not welcome being in alliances ?

Richard Woolcott is a former head of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

print

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to RICHARD WOOLCOTT. Over reaction in the South China Sea when US influence is waning and Chinese influence is rising

  1. John Kotsopoulos says:

    I recall an interview early this year on Fox News with a former US diplomat who was asked whether the US was still bound by treaty to defend Taiwan if it was attacksd by China. Yes he replied. But added with a wry smile “we’d havs to borrow the money from China.”

    Actually China and America have each other by the short and curlies. The former hood immense amounts of US debt. China on the other hand has drawn massive amounts of rural labour to manufacturing centres to supply the insatiable US appetites for cheap imports. Any significant drop in US imports will create a serious risk of civil significant civil unrest

  2. jim dodd says:

    for any intersted parties

    please refer: uss liberty

    http://www.consortiumnews.com

    http://www.mondoweiss.org

  3. Tony Kevin. says:

    I agree with Richard Woolcott. Even US admits that their naval vessel was inside the Chinese claimed 12 NM zone around one of the Chinese claimed island territories.. in other words, the US was testing the Chinese sovereignty claim. To then accuse the Chinese intercepting vesssel of dangerous navigation is disingenuous to say the least. Why does Australia give moral support to such provocative behaviour by US? They should not be playing naval chicken with China in waters claimed by China.

Comments are closed.