KIM WINGEREI. An Australian Spring

The Wentworth by-election was not just a resounding loss for the Liberal Party, but also the clearest message yet that the people have had enough of party politics. Fielding an impressive and like-able candidate who did (almost) nothing wrong in his campaign, the Labor Party lost, too.

Granted, Wentworth is not exactly Labor heartland, nevertheless you’d expect some of the swing against the incumbent to go to the main opposition party, but it didn’t. Instead, independent Kerryn Phelps won, the Liberal Coalition has lost their majority and will have to rely on cross-bench support.

We can only hope that this means bringing the humanitarian crisis on Manus and Nauru to an end, that it forces the Government to recognise climate change as a real issue, leads to a sensible outcome of the religious freedom debate and that other issues are addressed in a less adversarial manner.

And that is where Bill Shorten comes in. Shorten and the Labor party now has the luxury of setting the agenda from the comfort of opposition. He has an opportunity to recognise what Scott Morrison won’t: that politicians are not trusted and people see politics as a game of the mediocre, the mendacious and the hypocritical.

Faced with an unpredictable Scott Morrison, Shorten has a unique opportunity to show he can be the leader of a nation, and take on the quest for much-needed unity.

Bill, please don’t gloat over the Liberal’s loss. It’s theirs to deal with, take the high ground and let it be.

Please listen to a populace that is sick and tired of petty and short sighted party politics and show the soon to be opposition the respect you think you have deserved.

Show us it is possible to address policy issues with considered debate, broad consultation and search for consensus.

Stop making a constant mockery out of Parliament and start treating it as the most important chamber of decision making in the country, not just a mush-pit of puerile name calling and mud-slinging.

Show us that policy is more important than politics.

Show us that politics is not run by donors and lobby groups. One of many areas of reform that will have overwhelming support throughout the electorate.

Tell us you are hearing the many voices asking for the end of excessive entitlements for politicians – past and present.

Recognise that some of your colleagues on both side of the aisle don’t always act in the best interest of the people and propose a federal ICAC.

Restore decency into the political discourse by firmly renouncing the racist elements of our society – especially those that represent such sentiments in Parliament.

Recognise that good policy is not always popular policy – be brave, be clear and be bold and address the travesties of our border protection policies.

Set clear and aggressive emission targets. Use your platform of assumed authority to make combating climate change a national priority, not just a cost-cutting exercise.

And make it all about the people, about all of us. Not through the usual glib motherhood statements, but by running a campaign focused on issues and solutions, not just winning an election for a self-serving party.

Be transparent, be honest, tell us the truth, not what you think we want to hear.

Restoring the trust in our democracy is no easy task. It will take time, it will take sacrifices by those that purport to lead, it will meet much resistance from those enjoying the status quo. It will take leadership of a different kind.

Kerryn Phelps election is a win for democracy. But she is not the saviour. If the win is to mean anything the whole political diaspora needs to act. Let her win not be in vain and the opportunity for real change waste away like the Arab spring.

Let this instead be the Australian spring of democracy reform.

Kim Wingerei is a former businessman, turned writer, blogger and commentator; passionate about free speech, democracy and the politics of change. Author of “Why Democracy is Broken – A Blueprint for Change”. Follow @ kimwingerei.com

print

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to KIM WINGEREI. An Australian Spring

  1. Dr John CARMODY says:

    Mr Wingeri writes that Mr Sharma (the hapless Liberal candidate for Wentworth) is an “impressive and like-able candidate”. He may know Mr Sharma — I certainly don’t; otherwise how does he know that Sharma is “like-able”. If he does not know him, he has no right or basis for making that “like-able” comment. In any case, such a personalty trait (even it it is true) is entirely irrelevant to his election to be part of a Government and a potential Minister.

    Was Sharma, n fact, “impressive” and did he, as Mr Wingeri asserts (without evidence) who “did (almost) nothing wrong in his campaign,”? He has been reported as going into business with Israeli businessmen almost as soon as he left the diplomatic servicc. That (if true) is just as bad as ministers doing the same thing. I DO NOT consider such an action “impressive”. It is not the “ethics” which I hope for in a parliamentary aspirant.

    And, the the ALP “lose” as Wingeri insists. quite the reverse. In his campaigning, the PM (Scott Morrison” repeatedly gave ALP (and other) voters the “de facto” advice that if they wanted to defeat the Coalition candidate, they had to vote strategically and vote — however reluctantly — for Dr Phelps. Otherwise she’s come in third place on primary votes and her preferences would ensure Mr Sharma’s election. It was, in short, arithmetically essential that Phelps should get enough primary votes (ideally about 30%) to ensure that she’d be in second place in the primary count, so that Green and ALP preferences would prefer her to Sharma. To see the “low” ALP vote in any other way suggests that he does not fully understand the operation of the preferential voting system.

  2. A Sniveller says:

    How to achieve all the above: make a commitment that halfway through your first term, you will declare “my work here is done” and step aside for Albo.

Comments are closed.